Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1046

reference
23-tree-1
name
1046
tree-preservation-order

undefined

23-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.966309 50.851948)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.966252 50.851942,-0.966254 50.851953,-0.966262 50.851963,-0.966275 50.851971,-0.966290 50.851976,-0.966308 50.851978,-0.966326 50.851977,-0.966341 50.851972,-0.966354 50.851964,-0.966363 50.851954,-0.966366 50.851943,-0.966363 50.851932,-0.966355 50.851922,-0.966343 50.851914,-0.966327 50.851908,-0.966310 50.851906,-0.966292 50.851908,-0.966276 50.851913,-0.966263 50.851921,-0.966255 50.851931,-0.966252 50.851942)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL